Paperless voting is NOT what the founders had in mind when talking about a government by the people. Without paper voting, a receipt for your vote, how will a discrepancy ever be resolved? Are we supposed to take the vendors word of the winner? What if, in all probability, the 2000 elections WERE, in fact, tampered with? Can the integrity of our constitution ever be upheld?
If the winner of an election is held solely on paperless ballot, then it only takes the person with the most money and the least morals to win. How is that any way for a country to survive?
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment